Misdiagnosed and Misunderstood: Why Children in Care Deserve to Be Seen as a Whole
Understanding children holistically, not just from one diagnosis
So many children who come into care carry more than belongings in a bag. They carry deep emotional stories that are not always visible. They carry confusion, fear, survival instincts, and the effects of things that happened long before they were even born.
It is not uncommon to see a child in foster care given a diagnosis such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Autism, or Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD). Sometimes, they are given all of these. Sometimes, one diagnosis comes after another and yet, none of them seem to fully explain the child in front of us. Their behaviour still feels misunderstood, and their needs still feel unmet.
This is not because professionals do not care. They do. But the system that is meant to support these children often looks at them through separate windows. One service assesses attention and activity. Another looks at sensory processing. Somewhere else, there may be a trauma worker, a paediatrician, or an educational psychologist. All of these professionals may be working with the same child, but they rarely speak to each other. So the child becomes split between departments, between definitions, and between diagnoses.
And when we split a child into parts, we miss who they really are. We may miss the trauma they experienced before they were born. We may miss the impact of neglect, fear, or disrupted attachment. Often, a child’s attention difficulties are diagnosed as ADHD, without anyone seeing that their brain has been trying to survive since day one.
Children in care often move from placement to placement not because they are too difficult, but because no one has yet truly understood their needs. They are trying to make sense of the world with nervous systems shaped by fear, alcohol related neurodevelopmental disorders, or alcohol related birth defects. Their diagnoses may tell one story, but their behaviour tells another.
What would happen if, instead of separating the pieces, we brought them together? What if, from the very beginning, every child in care was seen through a holistic, whole-child lens? A lens that considers their full story their neurology, their trauma, their history, their relationships, and their voice.
A joined up, whole child approach would mean fewer misdiagnoses, fewer placement breakdowns, and more children who feel safe, understood, and supported. It would give carers the right information to meet a child’s real needs. It would mean fewer children being told they are the problem, and more being told they are understood.
We need to ask not only what behaviour a child is showing, but why. We must remember that behind every label is a life. Behind every assessment is a heart. These children are more than symptoms. They are more than referrals. They are whole people many living with neurodevelopmental conditions or alcohol related birth injuries and they deserve to be seen as such.
It is not about removing diagnoses, but about understanding them in context. It is about taking the time to listen, to connect the dots, and to see the child not just the file.
